Archive for August, 2006

Weekly Innovation Roundup (August 26)

Zorbing

It’s a new “extreme sport” where you roll down across an open field in an inflatable sphere. If you do accomplish this task, you then earn the grand title of Zorbonaut.

The touchless cellphone

This phone knows to answer an incoming call when the device is held to the user’s cheek!

Farecast

A websitewhich tells you whether you should buy that flight ticket now or wait until prices drop.

Designer Frig

Customizable “skins” for your frig!

Flying Carpet Recliner

Personal Helicopter

Credit-card cum Money-clip

Comments

Weekly Innovation Roundup (August 13)

B.O.S.S. (Battery Operated Smart Servant) - an automated shopping cart that follows you around. From the University of Florida.

VideoJug: Ordinary people sharing their expertise. “How to” videos that show you how to do anything from making mango chutney to unblocking a sink.

Brooklyn Superhero Supply: Where Superman and Batman might go for a makeover, or ordinary folks like you and me can get equipped with anything from utility belts to shapeshifting powers. Or is it really a secret imaginative after-school tutoring centre?

(Cover art by Michael Avon Oeming for Powers v2 # 13 - one of my favourite comic books.)

Comments

Animal freaks on rainy days: how to market a museum

Ever wonder how to sell the same thing to different people?

It’s probably easier if what you’re selling is an offer to view art or entertainment, such as the Tate Museum in London. But the Tate’s latest innovation, called “Your Collection” is absolutely brilliant! They describe it thus:

Tate Britain displays British art from 1500 to today. Yes, it’s a museum, but it’s also like a big living room. All those works of art are yours.

Tate has devised a new way of looking at the Displays with a range of themed ‘Collections’. These suggest a number of personal journeys you could take, reflecting different moods and enthusiasms and revealing the extraordinary breadth of work on show.

 

Underlying this innovative approach are a couple of old-fashioned marketing tools (and one new tool) combined with a large dose of marketing imagination:

1. Segmentation: Mutually exclusive ways of dividing the market into homogenous groups of people. I’m guessing that the variable here is “reasons why someone might want to visit a museum”. And they have certainly pushed that thought to the limit.

2. Concept design: Bundling relevant product attributes into a concept that appeals to the target segment. A simple idea executed with elegance by the Tate.

3. Mass customization: Using the “power of the Internet” to allow people to create their own concepts (”Your Collection”).

4. Branding: The very fact that the Tate is doing this and the way in which they’ve done it says something about the Tate brand - it’s cool, innovative, entertaining and fun and it’s for people like me! Quite different from the immediate mental image of a “museum”.

Take a look at the Snake Coffee Collection at the Tate!

 

Comments (1)

Weekly Innovation Roundup (August 8)

Comments

Brand Meaning: Manufactured or Discovered?

Rob Walker recently wrote about brands in the NY Times:

[A brand is] a process of attaching an idea to a product… Even companies like Apple and Nike, while celebrated for the tangible attributes of their products, work hard to associate themselves with abstract notions of nonconformity or achievement. A potent brand becomes a form of identity in shorthand.

Commenting on this on his blog, Grant McCracken wrote this provocative definition of branding:

If brands are ideas, then branding is a process of meaning manufacture and management.

Businessweek recently published their list of the world’s top 100 brands. Thinking about some of them in the light of Mr. McCracken’s definition, this is what I came up with:

1. Coca Cola: As a product, Coke is hardly different from any other cola brand. The appeal of the brand idea (Classic, American) is probably the single biggest reason for consumers to buy it. A ‘manufactured’ brand? Yes.

2. Microsoft: Brand? Idea? Consumer? Meaning? Clearly there’s little to talk about there. However, one could argue that there is the potential to develop the brand - to attach emotion and true meaning to its products. But this can’t be a superficial task and certainly can’t be achieved by mere advertising. In fact, unless the products themselves reflect the brand, everything else is pure faff.

3. IBM: I think this is a case where the brand has been ‘manufactured’ in the recent past. It used to stand for cutting-edge, reliable computers, lost that meaning when its products couldn’t keep up and now wraps its new IT services offering inside the hugely appealing brand idea of a helpful, almost god-like person from the ‘helpdesk’.

4. Disney: Sure, this brand has a lot of wonderful emotion and meaning attached to it. But Disney was a real person who built an entertainment and media empire. In a sense, he was the brand. That it has endured beyond his lifetime is due to good management of the characters and storytelling franchises which he created. One wonders if the Virgin brand will endure as long. Is Disney a ‘manufactured’ brand? No.

5. Toyota: This is a brand built upon the quality of its products. Has it been ‘manufactured’? No. However, this is a product category which has plenty of meaning to its consumers and Toyota has recognized and utilized that meaning in its communication activities.

(Note that the above are all ranked in Businessweek’s top ten brands for 2006. I chose them based solely on whether I knew enough about them to think about how they have developed as brands over time.)
Therefore, one can conclude that:
a. Brand meaning CAN be manufactured; products CAN be imbued with meaning. However, many existing brands already have meaning in consumers’ minds and not all of it is ‘manufactured’. Such brands need to be understood and carefully managed by their stewards.

b. Some brands, especially newer ones, do not yet have strong meaning. The meaning CAN and SHOULD be ‘constructed‘. However, this can’t be a superficial process involving brand names and advertising. Unless the product or offering truly delivers what the brand promises, the effort of branding will be unsuccessful.

(Developed from a comment originally written on Grant McCracken’s blog).

Comments

Weekly Innovation Roundup (August 1)

Comments